<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The VMguy &#187; Disaster Recovery</title>
	<atom:link href="http://vmguy.com/wordpress/index.php/archives/tag/disaster-recovery/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://vmguy.com/wordpress</link>
	<description>Virtualization for the little guy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 16:37:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>SRM Per-VM licensing coming September 1</title>
		<link>http://vmguy.com/wordpress/index.php/archives/1433</link>
		<comments>http://vmguy.com/wordpress/index.php/archives/1433#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 16:37:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The VMguy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Disaster Recovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Site Recovery Manager]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vmguy.com/wordpress/?p=1433</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You may remember from a recent article that I wrote about the VMware licensing dilemmas, that one of the scenarios I mentioned was SRM licensing when a customer wants to protect only a small percentage of VMs.  In the per-CPU licensing model, a customer would have to license all of the CPUs in a cluster [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You may remember from a recent article that I wrote about the <a href="http://vmguy.com/wordpress/index.php/archives/1413" target="_blank">VMware licensing dilemmas</a>, that one of the scenarios I mentioned was SRM licensing when a customer wants to protect only a small percentage of VMs.  In the per-CPU licensing model, a customer would have to license all of the CPUs in a cluster even if they wanted to protect only 10% of the VMs.  VMware <a href="http://www.vmware.com/support/licensing/per-vm/index.html" target="_blank">has announced</a> that Per-VM licensing will be available on September 1, 2010.  Customers will now be able to license SRM on a Per-VM basis.  Customers who like their per-CPU model will be able to continue that purchasing method until December 15, 2010.  After that, it&#8217;s per-VM only.</p>
<p>There are a few things to think about with regard to licensing  first, vSphere 4.1 now allows for <a href="http://searchvmware.techtarget.com/tip/0,289483,sid179_gci1516818,00.html" target="_blank">DRS affinity</a> so that VMs only move between certain hosts of a cluster.  I&#8217;m still waiting for a definite answer from my VMware friends but that <em>should</em> allow you to protect some VM&#8217;s and set their DRS Affinity to only the hosts that you own SRM CPUs for and still keep the full cluster for the unprotected VMs. Previously, VMware would recommend that you create a separate cluster for your &#8220;protected&#8221; VMs if they were a small subset of the whole.  Now with DRS Affinity, you can dictate that certain &#8220;protected&#8221; VMs only move between a subset of a cluster.  We&#8217;ll still have to wait and see the final ruling from VMware but I&#8217;m thinking that would work in the short-term for those in the per-CPU dilemma.</p>
<p>The second feature of the new licensing that I really like is the rolling average of VMs over the last twelve months.  What that translates to is that now I need to buy what my daily average of VMs protected would be over a 12 month period.  If I have certain points of the year where my VM count spikes, this average would be monitored by vCenter and alarm if I am going over my licensing limits.  However, I would only need the average number of protected VMs over the past year.  The system will continue to run after going over your limit but that&#8217;s definitely not something I would condone (Famous VMware SE saying: ethics don&#8217;t ship in the box people).</p>
<p>The per-vm licenses are sold in blocks of 25 and range from $1,250 to $11,250 depending on the product.  Per-vm licensing will be available for Chargeback, Appspeed, SRM, and, later this year, CapacityIQ.  You can find more information on VMware&#8217;s website <a href="http://www.vmware.com/support/licensing/per-vm/index.html" target="_blank">here.</a></p>
<p>The last question I had was, &#8220;How do I know what my rolling average is for those licenses?&#8221;  The good news is that once you enter in a license key, the new <a href="http://www.vmware.com/support/vsphere4/doc/vsp_41_new_feat.html#management" target="_blank">license reporting manager</a> in vSphere 4.1 will tell you what your rolling average is year-to-date.  Looks like someone was planning ahead.</p>
<script type="text/javascript">
  addthis_url    = 'http%3A%2F%2Fvmguy.com%2Fwordpress%2Findex.php%2Farchives%2F1433';
  addthis_title  = 'SRM+Per-VM+licensing+coming+September+1';
  addthis_pub    = 'thevmguy';
</script><script type="text/javascript" src="http://s7.addthis.com/js/addthis_widget.php?v=12" ></script>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://vmguy.com/wordpress/index.php/archives/1433/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Site Recovery Manager by example</title>
		<link>http://vmguy.com/wordpress/index.php/archives/30</link>
		<comments>http://vmguy.com/wordpress/index.php/archives/30#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 21:08:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The VMguy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Disaster Recovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Celerra]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EMC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Replication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Site Recovery Manager]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://VMGUY.COM/wordpress/?p=30</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of my favorite things in talking to people is when they tell me how well the software I teach them about works.  Even better is when someone will take the time to blog about their experiences.  I have had a few customers become early adopters of Site Recovery Manager.  One of the most memorable [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of my favorite things in talking to people is when they tell me how well the software I teach them about works.  Even better is when someone will take the time to blog about their experiences.  I have had a few customers become early adopters of Site Recovery Manager.  One of the most memorable was a customer (let&#8217;s call him Virtual_JTW) whom I worked with in September.  On a Friday afternoon we ran thru configuring and setting up SRM in his environment.  We worked thru the configuration and integration with his Celerra storage.  In the end, we passed with flying colors and his Disaster Recovery test was 100% successful.  It was fun and exciting for me to watch Virtual_JTW&#8217;s reaction to the success of the test.  He felt so impressed by the results and his subsequent demonstration for his Disaster Recovery team, he felt the need to blog on the whole experience.  You can read his account of what happened as well as the test results <a href="http://communities.vmware.com/blogs/ManualAutomation/2008/10/07/site-recovery-manager-is-a-hit" target="_blank">here</a> .</p>
<script type="text/javascript">
  addthis_url    = 'http%3A%2F%2Fvmguy.com%2Fwordpress%2Findex.php%2Farchives%2F30';
  addthis_title  = 'Site+Recovery+Manager+by+example';
  addthis_pub    = 'thevmguy';
</script><script type="text/javascript" src="http://s7.addthis.com/js/addthis_widget.php?v=12" ></script>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://vmguy.com/wordpress/index.php/archives/30/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
